Mcdonalds The Best And Largest Fast Food Restaurant...

Name:-prabhkirat thiara Unit standard: - US2950 Student id111: - ND15220 Introduction:- McDonalds’ is one of the best and largest fast food restaurant chains in all over world. They have 30,000 restaurants in over 100 countries. Their main object is to be best in fast food market rather than to be biggest restaurant chain in world. They served over one billion people in 2007 moreover their income was down in 2007 but they made a revenue record of $ 23 billion. As they have great brand image in market so to keep that brand image and that standard they always keep focusing on their strategies. Like in U.S. they are focusing on breakfast and chicken so, they launched new product for promotion which is southern style biscuit for breakfast and southern style chicken for lunch it attracts people a lot and in Europe their menu features premium selection and classic menu which offers a cheap or affordable meals and they also provide limited time food promotion moreover in Asia-pacific, middle east and in Africa their plan is to focus on convenience, breakfast and value. And McDonald gives lots of importance to drive thru and continues they are getting success in this. To satisfy their customers they open their drive thru late night for late nighters who want quick bite of their meal. Moreover, McDonald is upgrading their restaurants with opening of Mccafe in all over world. And they mainly attract their customers through social media. Marketing mix that McDonaldsShow MoreRelatedMcdonald s Swot Analysis For Marketing Success1238 Words   |  5 Pagesclearly shows that McDonalds is achieving its success by listening to customers and fulfilling their needs. its recognized through more and more promotions and advertisements and also through its logo design which is a huge yellow M. McDonalds also keep in mind the customers need and by looking at it, they decide what to serve, what will be the price of the product, how to advertise its product and the location of the restaurant. Which will be more convenient to the customers McDonalds also identifiesRead MoreBurger King Is The Best Burger Chain1063 Words   |  5 Pageshamburger chain was born more than 100 years ago. Since then hundreds of burger chains have prospered; top competitors today are McDonald’s, Wendy’s, Burger King. And this argument discusses why Burger King is the best burger chain among those three. By stating straightforward, Mcdonald s share the most in the hamburger industry. However, Burger King is much better than McDonald s business wise, taste wise, and charity wise. Burger King was founded in 1954, and is the second largest hamburger chainRead MoreEffective Advertising Planning and Implementation Paper1432 Words   |  6 PagesAdvertising Planning and Implementation Paper McDonalds Fast Food McDonalds is the largest chain of fast food restaurants that was founded in 1940 in San Bernardino, California by Ray Kroc. The company is currently headquartered in Oak Brook, Illinois. There are 47 million customers served each day in the franchise. The total employees that were recorded in 2008 were 40,000, which are spread all over the world, in 119 countries and territories. McDonalds has expanded into many international marketsRead MoreSWOT and Value Chain Analysis of McDonalds1401 Words   |  6 Pagesï » ¿ Case analysis On McDonalds Sadikchya Acharya Kings College International American University Babarmahal, Kathmandu MBA Capstone Prof. Dr. Raj Kumar Sharma International American University Kings College Babarmahal, Kathmandu Introduction and Background McDonalds as establishes in 1955 corporation and the multinational was first started by form Roy, it has its global operation for more than 119 countries selling its food items globally specially Korc. Currently as we see the data there areRead MoreMcdonalds vs Burger King1374 Words   |  6 PagesFast food is currently one of the biggest businesses in the United States due to the hectic schedules that the average person has to deal with. It is often necessary to grab food on the go because there just isn’t enough time to cook at home. This is the main reason behind the tremendous success of fast food giants such as McDonalds and Burger King. McDonald s Corporation is the world s largest chain of hamburger fast food restaurants, serving around 68 million customers daily in 119 countriesRead MoreMcdonald s An Example Of A Service / Product Mix Essay1704 Words   |  7 Pagesare for example agriculture and construction. Both agriculture and construction results in the creation of some kind of tangible object. The service industry includes everything else, for example banking, hotels, airlines, insurance, education, restaurants, etc. A services dominated economy is characteristic of more developed countries than developing countries. Realistically the majority of services include some form of good and most goods include some form of service (the delivery of a good). ServicesRead MoreFood And Beverage Industry : Supply Chain Management1123 Words   |  5 PagesINTRODUCTION: - Food and beverage industry today has become one of the most competitive industries in the world. Recognizing that supply chain management is a core strategy and achieving world class performance in this strategy by developing and managing supply chains that provide flexibility, response time and delivery performance that exceed the competition is a key to survival in the food and beverage industry. The largest production sectors of food industry are brewing, milling, baking, confectioneryRead MoreThe Success Of The Fast Food Industry1295 Words   |  6 Pagesboard at a restaurant, hoping to learn the world of business. He decided to put his restaurant knowledge to use as a traveling milkshake machine salesman. The machines that he sold made five shakes at once, increasing restaurant efficiency. This business remained in sales for 17 years. The fast food industry began with two brothers, Mac and Dick McDonald, in San Bernardino, California in the 1940s. They owned a small, but very successful restaurant that sold only a few kinds of simple food, mostlyRead MoreWendys vs. Mcdonalds642 Words   |  3 Pageslocations. A. Wendy s first restaurant opened on November 15 1969 in Columbus Ohio. 1. 1 year later the second Wendy s Old Fashioned Hamburgers was opened on the other side of town. 2. The second Wendy s also displayed their first ever drive up window. B. In 1976 Wendy s had its first public stock with 1 million common shares for 28 dollars a share. 1. Wendy s spread to Canada in late 1976 to add the 500th Restaurant. 2. Today Wendy s has more than 6,000 restaurants in many different countryRead MoreAnalysis of McDonald’s1660 Words   |  7 PagesThe McDonalds Corporation is the largest chain of fast food restaurants in the world. It is franchised in over 119 countries and serves an average of 68 million customers daily. The company started in 1940 as a barbecue restaurant operated by Richard and Maurice McDonald in the United States. They reorganized their business as a hamburger stand in 1948. In 1955, Businessman Ray Kroc joined the company as a franchise agent. He purchased the chain from the McDonald brothers and oversaw its global-wide

Crash Paper Free Essays

Crash displayed various aspects of racism and stereotypes that occur everyday. One of the three major scenes in the movie that stood out was when the two officers pull over a black couple. Obviously they’ve done nothing completely harmful, reckless or dangerous. We will write a custom essay sample on Crash Paper or any similar topic only for you Order Now The leading officer claims the wife was performing falatio, while driving a vehicle, which could be a form of reckless driving and can be penalized for it. In fear of authority, and in all respect, the husband complies as polite as possible to the officers demands. While doing so, the officer is responding in the rudest manor. He asks the officer if it’s okay to reach in the glove department for his paperwork and the officer replies with a very suspicious â€Å"yeah nice and slow†. Now on the other hand, the other officer takes no part in what goes on next because he knows what’s right and wrong, he’s deemed the â€Å"good† cop. The leading officer comes back to test him if he’s drunk and driving and he wasn’t. Complying with the officer once again, he did it. His wife, a little drunk, tries to explain in a firm manor that they’ve done nothing wrong and what he’s doing is wrong. Feeling an undermining to his authority, he gets angry and as she gets out of the car to confront him he tells the couple to turn around and place their hands behind their heads. As he pats down his wife, he grabs her inappropriately and asks what should be done since what they’ve done can technically be seen as a crime. Coming back to complying to an authoritarian figure out of fear and recognition of authority, her husband had one of two choices; he either could’ve spoken up, done something about it and got arrested or kept quiet, let him do what he knew was wrong and be let off with just a warning. Thinking that he would not win over an authority figure like the cop’s word, he didn’t say anything and let it happen. This situation brings up â€Å"The Authoritarian Personality† from one of the theories of prejudice in which the man complied to everything the officer asked for by just being or even just looking to be an authority figure. Also, the officer shows that intolerance and aggression as one would to those who don’t conform as well, as you would see in The Authoritarian Personality. There’s an automatic fear that comes to people when they think of the police. It’s the fact that they’re given that title of an officer of the law that leaves you naive to think anything he does is ok and even though you know it’s wrong sometimes, you don’t have the courage to say it cause you’re not supposed to. It’s not the norm of society. The second scene is where two black men walk out of the restaurant and the first one is the one that blames everything bad possible on his misfortune of being black. He continues on to complain about how since he’s black he had to wait a lot longer than the white people that were there being served. As he complained about what he didn’t get because he was black, his friend reminds him that he didn’t even want what he was complaining for and it’s not cause they’re both black. As his friend starts to make his case, he also reminds him that the waitress was indeed black and they weren’t racially prejudice. But he goes ahead anyways to continue blaming his skin color and that the waitress presumed that since they were dressed a certain way and talked a certain way they weren’t going to tip, so she waited a little longer to serve them. These are all examples of â€Å"Frustration and Scapegoating† from one of the theories of prejudice. It shows his need to blame white people for his personal shortcomings and misfortunes, such as waiting a long time to be served and being looked at as a threatening figure in society. Although, he wasn’t going to tip anyways and he and his friend are car-jackers. It’s crazy and ironic how he’d think that. And if there was such a stereotype, then why not beat it. To make it worse, he lived up to those same stereotypes and continued to blame other things. In the last scene, a middle eastern family man has a business which is his only source of income. From past experience and safety reasons he tells his, more educated and literate, American daughter to buy a gun for the store’s protection and his own. He orders a guy to come in and change the locks as well, but the problem happens to be the door and not the locks. He hires a technician to change the locks and he happens to be Hispanic. The Hispanic technician is a father of a five year old girl that moved out of his old neighborhood for her safety and a better upbringing. A couple days after, the two get into a fight, in which the middle eastern store owner screams at him for not changing the locks meanwhile the door is the one that needs a replacement, as the technician tries to explain. As the argument sprouts, the technician just wants his money and wants to leave but the owner doesn’t pay him and in anger he leaves. The next day the store gets torn apart, robbed and vandalized in all kinds of ways and now the store owner is left with nothing and his life is ruined. In anger and to gain vengeance, he takes the gun and directly assumes it was the lock technician that left in anger from the other day. As one of the theories of prejudice, selective perception, is portrayed here when he automatically assumes it was the Hispanic guy that talks a certain way and has visible eye-catching tattoos. Coming to an immediate conclusion that it was him, he goes to his house and asks for his money for the store and fires the blank bullet exactly when his daughter came in between. Both were left in shock, to only find out that it was a blank bullet. He had no evidence that it was him but just because he was Hispanic and looked like he would do something like that, he came to a conclusion that it was him. Ironically, the guy was the nicest man and an incredible father and proved his selective perception wrong. Assuming is a root to a kind of prejudice as well and this scene was a great example. How to cite Crash Paper, Essay examples

Life Before Birth free essay sample

Life before Birth Hello, my name is Christine Coleman. I Just recently like 8 weeks ago had the most precious little baby girl ever! She is in the picture at the top of my page. I watched the video life before birth and let me Just say before I watched that video I never for one minute thought about what actually takes place inside a female. I mean I knew like the basics I guess you could say, but the way that they described the sperm and the Journey that they have to go thru to even fertilize an egg is really amazing to me. I was a little grossed out by the sperm cemetery. Its amazing how 99% of the sperm are killed instantly and only about 3000 of them make it thru Just the vagina. Then only certain sperm with a chemical coating make It thru the fallopian tubes. Once they make it thru they can finally rest and wait. We will write a custom essay sample on Life Before Birth or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page The releasing egg sends chemical signals luring the sperm towards it. Once the sperm enters the egg it Instantly sparks electricity through its surface, this shock wave changes the egg membrane irreversibly and locks out the remaining sperm.In Just 24 hours one sperm out of a rolling has overcome the obstacles of finally being able to fertilize an egg. I also thought that when they did the music with headphones and the babys reaction to the hip hop and then the reaction with the classical music was really neat to watch their heart beat raise and then drop back down. When I was pregnant I always wondered If she could hear all the things that they say they can hear. The video showed me exactly that they can hear and their reaction to It. I thought this video was very Interesting and I learned quite a bit of Information that I really had no clue about.

US Foreign Policy in the Balkans

Introduction United States occupies a distinguishing position in global affairs. Never in history has a single country conquered the international arena to the extent that the U.S. does today, courtesy of its foreign policies, which continue to draw mixed reactions, ranging from admiration to envy and hatred (Cameron, 2005 p. xvi).  However, admirers and critics of U.S. foreign policies are often in agreement that no matter what the indicator – military might, economic vitality, democratic principles, political persuasion, and cultural model – the country is indeed in a league of its own.Advertising We will write a custom research paper sample on US Foreign Policy in the Balkans specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More The U.S. is the only superpower in the world and the only country able to project power and influence in every part of the world (Glenny, 2000), a fact reinforced by Cameron (2005), who notes that the U.S. h as been involved in resolving conflicts on every continent since the early 1990s either through military engagement or peaceful negotiations. This demonstrates that contrary to assertions made by critics to the effect that the U.S. does not have sound foreign policies (Kavalski, 2005), it is indeed in the frontline when it comes to expediting its values and interests in foreign countries.  This paper will critically evaluate the U.S. foreign policy in the Balkans, both during the cold war era and also in post-cold war period. According to Cameron (2005), â€Å"†¦foreign policy refers to a consistent course of actions followed by one nation to deal with another nation or region, or international issue† (p. xvii). In the context of this paper.  Therefore, the U.S. foreign policy would refer to the values and interests projected by the U.S. in the Balkans, a region largely made up of a number of countries, including Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Kosovo, Mace donia, Montenegro, and Serbia (US Department of State, 2011). Apart from Kosovo, which was considered as a province in Serbia, the other countries were considered as republics under the Yugoslavia federation during the cold war era, not mentioning the fact that they heavily leaned towards communist principles and ideologies perpetrated by the former USSR immediately after the Second World War (Eskridge-Kosmach, 2009). These political and ideological leanings towards communism greatly affected United States relations with Eastern Europe, and it was not until the collapse and disintegration of the USSR and communist ideologies in 1991 that real progress in the U.S. foreign policy in the Balkans began to take shape (Trachtenberg, 2008). US Foreign Policy in the Balkans during Cold War Era Immediately after the Second World War, the U.S. and her allies became cognizant of the fact that they had lost significant control of Eastern Europe to the Soviet Union. As such, the U.S acknowledged anti-communism to be its guiding standard to foreign policy in the region during the cold war era.Advertising Looking for research paper on international relations? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More The U.S. adopted a non-military foreign policy to stabilize Western Europe and prevent communist ideologies from encroaching Western Europe territory, while devising rigid policies that could decrease the Soviet Union’s influence in Eastern Europe and at the same time not be seen as a direct provocation to the Soviet Union (Trachtenberg, 2008). Some scholars have argued that the U.S. attempted to pursue a foreign policy that would make countries under Soviet’s influence in the Balkans to become economically dependent on the West and, if possible, coerce them into joining Western alliances, including NATO (Cameron, 2007 p. 9). This policy was meant to decrease the Soviet’s control, achieve potentially considerabl e geopolitical advantages, bring democracy to the Soviet bloc, recover lost trade and markets in the Balkans, and ensure a more stable and prosperous Europe (Trachtenberg, 2008). In 1948, the U.S. saw an opportunity to project its foreign policy in the Balkans when Josip Tito’s government in Yugoslavia split with the Soviet Union for pursuing domestic and foreign affairs policies that, according to Stalin, fundamentally deviated from the Marxist-Leninist line of thought. Yugoslav literature reveals that the breakup with Moscow was precipitated by Tito’s idea of pursuing a separate course towards socialism that could not be reconciled with the hegemonic model of the hierarchical organization witnessed in the socialist bloc (Perovic, 2007). The breakup notwithstanding, many scholars have underlined the â€Å"importance of Yugoslavia to the United States in its ‘wedge strategy’ directed towards the Soviet Bloc countries† (Eskridge-Kosmach, 2009 p. 383) . Of importance is the fact that the Harry S. Truman and Dwight D. Eisenhower administrations saw emergent opportunities for the U.S. to develop relations with Yugoslavia, a former strong ally of the Soviet Union. According to O’Brien (2006), this foreign policy was meant to alleviate the Soviet military power in addition to discrediting the Soviet tactics in the Balkans. This gives credence to the idea that a major hallmark of the U.S. foreign policy in the Balkans during the cold war was to discredit communism and prevent its spread.  The above policies failed to achieve much, prompting the U.S. to initiate a new foreign policy in the Balkans in the 1960s under the â€Å"New Deal.† According to Eskridge-Kosmach (2009), the new foreign policy focused on initiating â€Å"economic reforms aimed at the improvement of the system of ‘workers self-administration,’ stimulation of the private initiative in agriculture, and de-centralization of the economic man agement† (p. 385). In addition, the U.S. also encouraged communist countries to disobey Soviet imperialism, hoping that the economic reforms would trigger an ‘evolution’ from the communist model to national independence and free democratic societies (Trachtenberg, 2008).Advertising We will write a custom research paper sample on US Foreign Policy in the Balkans specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More Humanitarian relations and bi-lateral trade agreements with preferential terms were encompassed in the U.S’ â€Å"building bridges† concept that it entered with countries in the Balkans who exhibited a desire for political liberalization and the establishment of a representative government (Eskridge-Kosmach, 2009). It is worth mentioning that the U.S., in its attempts to progress these policies in the Balkans, did not want to break with the Soviet Union or create a scenario that would have led to a military confrontation with the Soviet, thus employed diplomacy and foreign aid to reach out to countries in the Balkans. However, much of the aid to the Balkans remained humanitarian assistance, not development aid (O’Brien, 2006). US Foreign Policy in the Balkans in Post-Cold War Era Opinion remains divided about the U.S. post cold war foreign policy in the Balkans, with some commentators arguing that the U.S. has been keen not to be drawn into geopolitical and ethnic-related conflicts that rocked the region after the disintegration of the Soviet Union (Brown, 2005), while others suggest that the Balkans has indeed become an emblematic feature of post-cold war geography of United States’ international relations (Joseph, 2005). According to Daalder (2002), â€Å"the U.S. debate over engagement in the Balkans has been conducted primarily in terms of the burdens the United States and Europe should carry in attempting to improve conditions in the region† (p. 3). While the EU accepts that it should bear the main burden in the reconstruction of the Balkans, it also expects others, including the U.S., to contribute. It is clear that the U.S. foreign policy of military intervention through NATO-sanctioned air strikes against Serb targets helped to end the wars witnessed in the Balkans in the 1990’s, though many analysts still maintain that the U.S. was late in its contribution, leading to the massacre of thousands of people (Brown, 2009). However, it should be remembered that in the mid-1990s, the U.S. diplomatic efforts played an instrumental part in the establishment of the Dayton Peace Agreements, which led to the halting of hostilities among warring parties in the Balkans by crafting the decentralized political system of Bosnia. However, the Dayton political compromise is largely viewed across various quarters as an unworkable one, and which hinders the successful integration of Bosnia into Euro-Atlantic institutions (Woehrel, 2009). One major post-cold war objective of the U.S. foreign policy in the Balkans is to stabilize the region in a way that is self-sustaining, democratic and does not require the frequent intervention of NATO-led forces and international diplomats (Woehrel, 2009), In equal measure, the United States has considerably assisted in the transition of the Balkan countries that were formerly under the Soviet bloc by encouraging political and economic reform, and by orienting them to join the EU and other Euro-Atlantic institutions (Veremis, 2001; Wisner, 2008).Advertising Looking for research paper on international relations? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Many countries in the Balkan are now holding free and fair elections, have vibrant civil society groups that are free to express a wide variety of views, and the independence of the media is almost guaranteed (Woehrel, 2009). This again demonstrates that the U.S. foreign policy in the Balkans has clearly underlined the need for the countries involved to shed off communist policies and ideologies, and embrace Western democratic principles and values. To support the rule of law and the punishment of initiators of the 1990’s Balkan war, the U.S. continues to condition developmental aid to Serbia on the full cooperation with the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTFY), not mentioning that the U.S. has initiated active mechanisms to support NATO membership for the countries in the Balkans (Woehrel, 2009). The U.S. continues to demand constitutional reforms in countries such as Bosnia and Serbia, implying that its foreign policy in the Balkans is more orie nted in solidifying the democratic gains so far been achieved. Woehrel (2009) also notes that the Balkans still â€Å"have a higher strategic profile given U.S. use of military bases in Romania and Bulgaria, which could be useful for U.S. operations in the Middle East† (p. 1). The U.S. has also played a role in facilitating economic reform in the Balkans and ensuring that countries achieve fiscal and monetary austerity. However, resistance to economic transparency, weak and corrupt state structures, and the absence of the rule of law in a number of countries continue to hinder progress in the economic front (Woehrel, 2009). It is important to note that the U.S role in the Balkans is largely viewed as peripheral since the EU is the mandated institution to oversee economic and political reforms in the Balkans, and to bring countries to join Euro-Atlantic institutions, thus stabilizing the region and the whole of Europe (Veremis, 2001; Joseph, 2005). The observation can be reinf orced by the fact that President Bush’ foreign policy in the Balkans oscillated along â€Å"controlled and gradual military and economic disengagement from the Western Balkans, allowing EU to fill this gap† (Sakellariou, 2011 para. 3). Through diplomatic means, however, the U.S. played perhaps the most fundamental role towards Kosovo’s independence, by pushing the latter to unilaterally proclaim her independence and by pressuring other EU member states to also recognize Kosovo’s independence (Dunn, 2009). Although the U.S. still maintains ground forces in Kosovo, and although the U.S. still retains its political and diplomatic clout in the region, it has substantially reduced the costs of its commitments in the Balkans, particularly after the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks on the United States (Sakellariou, 2011). International concerns, including the war on global terrorism and political stabilization of Iraq, Afghanistan and the Middle East, have substantially placed strains on U.S. resources, forcing the country to reduce its attention in the Balkans. In keeping with its current main foreign policy priority, however, the U.S. still actively engages the Balkans to stop terrorists from operating in countries such as Bosnia and Albania (Brown, 2009). The U.S. has also succeeded in bringing many countries in the Balkans to support the war on global terrorism. It is worthwhile to note that the Obama Admistration still pushes for further stabilization of the Balkans, but has continued to keep the region low on the U.S. foreign policy radar, in part due to the war on global terrorism and the stabilization of Iraq and Afghanistan. Conclusion Many policy analysts still feel that the U.S. should strengthen its foreign policy in the Balkans due to the perceived incapacity of the EU to give the needed impetus in the region, and also due to increasing Russia’s influence (Sakellariou, 2011). It is indeed true that the U.S. has for over a decade provided significant aid, advice and troop deployments to countries in the Balkans, but more still needs to be done to solidify the political, economic and democratic gains so far achieved, to uproot possible terrorist networks in the region, and to enhance trade ties with the region (Wisner, 2008; Joseph, 2005). It is imperative to note that unlike the EU, the U.S. still enjoys a substantial political credibility and good will in the Balkans, particularly among the Bosniaks and Albanians (Sakellariou, 2011). As such, it is only proper for the U.S. to remain committed towards solving the serious problems that still affects the region, including weak government structures, ineffective and politicized public administrations, weak and politicized judicial systems, government corruption and organized crime (Woehrel, 2009). A stable Balkans will not only ensure peace and prosperity in Europe, but also in the whole world. Reference List Brown, K. 2009. â€Å"Evaluating U.S . Democracy Promotions in the Balkans: Ironies, Inconsistencies, and Unexamined Influences.† Problems of Post-Communism 56, no. 3, 3-15. Cameron, F. 2005. â€Å"US Foreign Policy after the Cold War,† 2nd Ed. New York, NY: Routledge. Daalder, I.H. 2002. â€Å"The United States, Europe, and the Balkans.† Problems of Post-Communism 49, no. 1, 3-12. Dunn, D.H. 2009. â€Å"Innovation and Precedent in the Kosovo War: The Impact of Operation Allied Force on U.S. Foreign Policy.† International Affairs 85, no. 3, 531-546. Eskridge-Kosmach, A. N. 2009. â€Å"Yugoslavia and US Foreign Policy in 1960-1970s of the 20th Century.† Journal of Slavic Military Studies 22, no. 3, 389-418. Glenny, M. 2000. â€Å"Has anyone seen our Policy?† Washington Quarterly 23, no. 4, 171-175. Joseph, E.P. 2005. â€Å"Back to the Balkans.† Foreign Affairs 84, no. 1, 111-122. Kavalski, E. 2005. â€Å"The Balkans after Iraq†¦Iraq after the Balkans: Who’s ne xt?† Perspectives on European Politics Society 6, no. 1, 103-127. O’Brien, J.C. 2006. â€Å"Brussels: Next Capital of the Balkans?† Washington Quarterly 29, no. 3, 71-87. Perovic, J. 2007. â€Å"The Tito-Stalin Split: A Reassessment in Light of New Evidence.† Journal of Cold War Studies 9, no. 2, 32-63. Sakeilariou, A. 2011. â€Å"Obama’s Policy in the Western Balkans: Following Bush’s Steps.† Web. Trachtenberg, M. 2008. â€Å"The United States and Eastern Europe in 1945.† Journal of Cold War Studies 10, no. 4, 94-132. U.S. Department of State. 2011. â€Å"Balkans Region.† Web. Veremis, T. 2001. â€Å"The End of History – American Views on the Balkans.† Journal of Southeast European Black Sea Studies 1, no. 2, 113-122. Wisner, F.G. 2008. â€Å"The United States and the Balkans: Achieving Kosovo’s Independence.† American Foreign Policy Interests 30, no. 4, 189-195. Woehrel, S. 2009. â€Å"Fut ure of the Balkans and U.S. Policy Concerns† Congressional Research Service. Web. This research paper on US Foreign Policy in the Balkans was written and submitted by user Zayden Tyson to help you with your own studies. You are free to use it for research and reference purposes in order to write your own paper; however, you must cite it accordingly. You can donate your paper here.